In
President Obama’s address on the subject of Syria this past Tuesday, he made it
abundantly clear that the United States, along with 189 other world
governments, does not tolerate the use of chemical warfare. He is well aware of
our past military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan and in no way wants this to
turn into a full-blown war. His mission by going into Syria is to notify the
Assad-regime of just how wrong chemical warfare is. One statement by the president
that really struck a chord with me was when he said
“That's my judgment as
Commander-in-Chief. But I’m also the President of the world’s oldest
constitutional democracy. So even though I possess the authority to order
military strikes, I believed it was right, in the absence of a direct or
imminent threat to our security, to take this debate to Congress.”
In this statement he never says anything along the lines of “we’re going into Syria right away and
handling this with brute force.” The New
York Times even made note of this in their paper on Wednesday September 11th
by saying:
“Mr. Obama did not detail the steps
that the United States would demand from Syria as proof that the diplomatic
efforts were more than a delaying tactic to avoid a punishing strike from
cruise missiles and American bombers.”
No comments:
Post a Comment